Wednesday, 20 November 2013

Having looking into a few historical episodes in which people were accused of being motivated by antisemitism, it's clear to me that the people were so accused were in fact responding in an understandable, if not always excusable, way to Jewish actions, rather than being driven by some ancient, irrational hatred. So I intend to review the whole history of so-called antisemitism to see if other episodes, too, were not quite as advertised, and if something other than motiveless evil could have been at work.

Reading the book "A Convenient Hatred: the History of Antisemitism", I was struck by a quote from the Roman emperor Claudius. It relates to a dispute in the city of Alexandria that had broken out between the Jews there, the Greek community, and the Egyptians. The Jews were accused of disloyalty to Rome. They refused to let statues of the emperor be placed in their temples. As a result, their religious privileges were withdrawn. This culminated in fighting which reached almost the scale of all-out war.

The emperor Claudius tried to settle the matter by rendering a personal judgement on it. After returning their privileges to the Jews and giving a judgement that was favourable to them on the whole, he entered this interesting caveat:
The Jews, on the other hand, I order not to aim at more than they previously had, ...and not to intrude themselves into the games presided over by the [Greeks], since they enjoy what is their own, and in a city which is not their own they possess an abundance of all good things. Nor are they to bring in or invite Jews coming from Syria or [other parts of] Egypt, or I shall be forced to conceive graver suspicions. If they disobey, I shall proceed against them in every way as seeking to spread a sort of public sickness throughout the world.
Source: A Convenient Hatred: the History of Antisemitism by Phyllis Goldstein, Harold Evans

So the emperor warned the Jews not to use immigration to try and change the composition of the population in a specific area, thus altering the balance of political power there. That has very interesting parallels with our own times. And the final phrase the emperor uses is fascinating: "as seeking to spread a sort of public sickness throughout the world". To draw such an almost mystical generalisation from what, after all, was a local dispute, seems very odd. It was as if some curious insight had been achieved.


Reality Check said...

Very Interesting. There were a few emperors that were actually quite good rulers with intelligence and I will research Claudius. Of course, all we learn about Roman rule from our schools, teachers and professors are the evil emperors. That's the liberal world we live in.

Anonymous said...

i recommend reading i, claudius by richard harris, it's historical fiction but a lot of it is based on reality and it's quite entertaining and well worth a read.

such a shame it was written by a white guy, otherwise it'd undoubtedly be more popular

Anonymous said...

I, CLAUDIUS and the sequel, CLAUDIUS, THE GOD, were written by Robert Graves. They're both excellent and the British TV series adapted from them is also worth viewing. Relations between the Romans and the Jews were often tense, especially because the Jews pursued their own legal system parallel with the Roman one (thus in opposition to the ruling legal authority) and they often employed strangulation as a way to get around Roman restrictions re the death penalty. This aspect, that of a parallel jurisprudence, is also a major reason for tensions between Jews and Westerners historically and now we also see it with Sharia courts being granted legal authority. Ultimately, there should be only one system of law for all and one based on equality of all before the law. Neither Talmudic Judaism nor Islamic Sharia provide that necessary equality for societal peace and harmony.

Anonymous said...

Its those evil Joooos again......thats it......I'm telling you, they rule the world! Soon they will have poisoned all our precious bodily fluids.

Anonymous said...

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Anonymous said...

So organized Jewry instructs us that it is inevitable that the “Europe is not going to be the monolithic [Christian] societies they once were in the last century.” Europe will now be “transformed” into a patchwork of multi-cultural societies without identity, “and Jews are going to be at the centre of that” transformation.

This sounds more like a confession by Jewry of planned premeditated murder for group gain and advancement than it does a social, cultural or political forecast.

So in addition to Islam, it is now clear that Jewry has declared war on Christian Europe. These death cult Zionists and their suicidal Left-Right followers won’t be happy until the entire world is at their throats, which shouldn’t be long now. Yet apparently in their own minds, they’re on the cusp of world domination.

Their mentally unbalanced delusions are unbelievable. Americans and Europeans have been tied at the waist by our corrupt elites to a cult of maniacs. I say cut them all loose and send them hurtling to Israel, where they belong.

Anonymous said...

The comment by Anonymous @ 07:34 is a quotation attributed to Barbara Spectre who is one of the officials of a Jewish organisation based in Stockholm, PAIDEIA, which is funded by the Swedish government and the Wallenberg Foundation. Spectre's comment has been published widely, following a youtube video which has been available since 2010. She also heads the One Sweden organisation which supports 'multiculturalism' (cultural Marxism). Looking over the most recent programme of PAIDEIA, it has several talks scheduled on Judaism, Christianity and Islam, presenting, for example, a talk on "an analysis of Midrashic influence on Islamic scripture." The point has been made at Islam vs Europe in the past that Judaic texts and oral tradition are reflected and repeated in Islamic texts and practices. There is another talk planned which is somewhat evasive in that it states incorrectly that the Talmud largely seeks to 'ignore' Christianity.

Anonymous said...

You neglected to mention Barbara Spectre was born in Madison, Wisconsin, and educated in New York City, Barbara Spectre moved with her husband, Rabbi Philip Spectre, to Ashkelon, Israel in 1967 where she served on the faculty of Jewish Studies at Achva College of Education - bla bla bla - you can read the rest at wikipedia - the point is she is supposed to be American yet she is now in Sweden doing her bit for the white genocide - they sure get around. lf she renounced her weird death cult membership and rejoined the human race both her and us whites would be much better off - it aint gonna happen

Anonymous said...

I love the way when one Jewish person supports Islam, it is seen as representative, yet when another one does not it is somehow the exception. These same rules do not at all apply to other white people, ofc. I think I am going to go read something more cerebral, such as an article about how to get Marissa Miller's abs.

Anonymous said...

"I love the way when one Jewish person supports Islam, it is seen as representative, yet when another one does not it is somehow the exception."

Oh, you must mean all those atheist Jews that go around and claim all religion is bad and only when everyone accepts atheism will there be world peace.

Where have I heard that before? Oh right, Jews, through the advent of the Marxist Political Religion of Materialism which gives excuses for killing whole classes in holocausts. Jews were promoting genocides of classes for an atheistic utopia before Hitler was born.

Anonymous said...

Funny how this web site constantly runs stories about the Jews that even the nut-job Iranian mullahs would approve of. This web site is feeding you small bits of poison mixed in with the meat and potato stories about the islamic takeover of Europe. Classic false flag operation.

Anonymous said...

False flag indeed
"We painted Hitler as a monster, a devil. And that's why we could not move away from that portrayal after the war. We had mobilized the masses against the devil incarnate. And so we were forced to continue in this satanic scenario after the war. We could not possibly have explained to our people that the war had actually been only a preventative economic measure." -- Baker, James Addison (1930- ), Secretary of State of the USA (Quoted in Der Spiegel, issue 13/1992

"Atrocity propaganda is how we won the war. And we're only really beginning with it now! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they are doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly but with eagerness to please the victors, only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re-education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again - those indestructible weeds of historical truth." - Sefton Delmer (1904-1979 Jew), former British Chief of `Black propaganda': (Said after the German surrender, in 1945, in a conversation with the German professor of international law, Dr. Friedrich Grimm.)

Anonymous said...


The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service controls and oversees immigration into the United States.

Four general objectives are followed in deciding who is allowed to immigrate into the country:

1) To facilitate the reunification of families by admitting people who already have a family member living in the United States.

2) To attract workers to fill positions in certain occupations for which there are shortages.

3) To increase diversity by admitting people from countries with historically low rates of immigration to the United States.

4) To provide a refuge for people who face the risk of racial, religious, or political persecution in their home country.

Who is in charge of USCIS? Well, that would be Director Alejandro Mayorkas, a non-Jewish Spaniard born in Havana, Cuba. He was appointed by non-Jewish negro president Barak Hussein Obama in August 2009 and unanimously confirmed by the 98% non-Jewish United States Senate.

Getting the drift here? I suspect Europe follows the same freaking pattern!

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

What is the source for the Sefton Delmer quote?

Get Real said...

Oh but the Jews approve of it. That is all that matters. /sarc

Anonymous said...

We are now one of the largest Spanish-speaking nations in the world. We're a major source of Latin music, journalism and culture. ... Just go to Miami, or San Antonio, Los Angeles, Chicago or West New York, New Jersey ... and close your eyes and listen. You could just as easily be in Santo Domingo or Santiago, or San Miguel de Allende. ... For years our nation has debated this change some have praised it and others have resented it. By nominating me, my party has made a choice to welcome the new America.

- Non-Jewish George W Bush's campaign speech in Miami, Florida, 2000.

This complete Mexiphile was elected twice as U.S. president! Only the Congress held this non-Jewish, white traitor, back from rapidly destroying the U.S. through a tidal wave of Hispanics from Mexico and South America. These are his people.

Today, non-Jewish, negro president Obama seeks to finish Bush's work.

Bruno said...

Obviously, his mind was controlled by Jews. /sarc

But seriously, by all means, let's have a rational conversation about the role of leftist Jews in all this, but do not leave out the non-Jewish players who had/have the real power to destroy their own people and nations. Tony Blair, anyone?

Anonymous said...

22 nov 14.29
Your breakdown doesn't tell the whole story- jews hold key positions within the Obama administration and within the important house committees. John Kerry is jewish, a little known fact. Jews have a strangle hold on the judiciary too. No US president is elected unless he or she is'approved' by the tribe. Over 70% of the US media is controlled by jews. In 2001 lsraeli pm Sharon said 'we jews control America' - or words to that effect.
The jewish grip on America has become a source of embarrassment for jews - well it would be if they had any shame.

Anonymous said...

The Heretical website has some information on Delmer - including that he was jewish. Apparently his father was from Tasmania - moved to Berlin early in the 20th C, which is a little odd in itself - that isn't the sort of thing that happens every day, not out here in the colonies one hundred years ago anyway, which would lead one to suspect he had European roots, ie jewish. Delmer junior worked as a journalist in Berlin reporting for a British newspaper, cant remember which. The tone of his reports would suggest he wasnt very fond of the Nazis and later when the war commenced and he had a pivotal role in black propaganda radio directed at Germans he responded scathingly to a Hitler peace offer - on air, so scathing was he his superiors in government were a little piqued, apparently, and constrained in how they could respond to the peace offer by his vitriolic outburst against Hitler. Though l'm sure if the British (Churchill) wanted to make a peace with Germany they could have done so quite easily. have read Germany made over thirty peace offers during the course of the war, some direct, many through non aligned governments including Sweden, Switzerland, Spain etc.
l came across the above piece yesterday - l haven't verified the source but having read some of his earlier writing it does seem to fit his general tone.
The pre-war Times journalist based in Berlin wasnt a fan of the Nazis but conceded that German animosity directed toward jews was understandable given that the jews had Germany in a vice like grip. l take it the Times journalist wasnt a jew. l think it was he who remarked that it was surprising how muted the German response had been toward the jewish power grab. There were many influential members and advisers connected to both the British and US governments who called for the complete destruction of Germany such that post war Germany would have no industrial capacity whatsoever - post war Germany would be returned to an agrarian country like those of the Middle Ages. Interestingly it is now absolutely certain that Roosevelts administration was riddled with commie spies who reported directly to Moscow - including Roosevelts principal policy advisor. It goes without saying that there were many jews in the Roosevelt administration, historically a record number for an American administration. That has been the general rule more or less ever since.
There is a lot of material at the below site

Anonymous said...

And regarding Roosevelt very few Americans will concede let alone talk about the poisonous nature of his administration - poisonous and utterly compromised. And that leads you into the 50's and Joe McCarthy who has been horribly vilified - crushed even. McCarthy was absolutely correct when he said there were commies literally everywhere in the US - including under the bed. McCarthy tabled a mountain of documents to substantiate his 'hysterical' claims - all of these documents have been purged from the US records and McCarthys reputation is now mud - he was right. He was cognisant of the jewish hand at work in American affairs but held his hand - was he afraid?
Fast forward to the Nixon era - the recently cleared Nixon tapes have got that president confiding in an advisor that he is 'deadly afraid of the jews'. l wonder what he meant?
A commenter above mentions Bushs role in mexicanising the US, Tony Blairs policies were similiarly detrimental to white interests. It is true that many whites have sold out their own people and are equally to blame for the dire predicament we find ourselves in. l'm certain the Chinese and the Mexicans and the muslims etc find it awfully amusing to witness the breathtakingly speedy decline of the Europeans - a decline that is without parallel in history. Maybe we should blame both the whites and the jews for the decline. l have no doubt its going to impact jews just as badly as it will impact whites. Its possible jews might be more adaptable to surviving in a hostile world than are whites - but l wouldn't want to count on it if l were a jew. The demographic changes in the West are far too sweeping. Should jews and whites team up and try and turn things around? l cant conceive of something like that happening but who knows. If they got rid of the Talmud (full of hate speech) l guess its possible.
Whites really need their own country. Jews have their own country. Whites are the only large racial group that don't have their own country/countries. Whites need their own country.

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous @04:39. Thanks for your very interesting comments. Have you read BLACKLISTED BY HISTORY: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy by M Stanton Evans? It is an interesting book which largely vindicates McCarthy's efforts and elaborates on the extent of Communist infiltration and the US officialdom actively involved in covering up the extent of that penetration, which was precisely what McCarthy contended in his Senate hearings.

Anonymous said...

CZ here is a link to the German wikipedia entry on Prof. Grimm.
They call him a nazi and various other things - as for the authenticity of Grimms conversation with Sefton Delmer l think the entry denies such a conversation ever took place. l dont lean one way ot the other but its the victor who writes the history and the loser in this particular case doesnt get much of a look in. lt is claimed the mistreatment of German pow's by the Allies (supposedly the good guys) at the end of the war caused the death of 1.25 million Germans (the Rhine open air death camps) and possibly three or four million more civilian deaths due to starvation and the like - and many hundreds of thousands? of German civilians murdered in the east all of which has been suppressed/ignored makes one wonder about the Allies version of history. There are photos of the Rhine meadows camps online - it isnt an overstatement to say the scenes depicted are absolutely appalling, like wise there is footage on youtube of Russian and Czech commie soldiers shooting hundreds of German civilians (including children) in Prague in broad daylight at the end of the war. There are many more reasons to question what we've been told about the war but time is always a constraint and it does take us away from the present and most of our focus needs to be back here in the present. However l do recall an article in the Daily Mail a year or two ago? in which two hundred WW11 veterans and others were asked about their wartime sacrifice - all of them said if they had known back then what the future had in store for Britain they would not have fought and sacrificed their all, a bitter indictment of what has become of the West - so what were we fighting for, our own destruction it seems and not much else - well that is what is being delivered to us.

Anonymous said...

Nothing is funnier than Useful Idiots rushing out to defend the Jews. Seriously, how stupid are you people?

George Soros
Tim Wise
Noel Ignatiev
Francis Fox Piven
Franz Boas
Joe Slovo
Bela Kun
Genrikh Yagoda
Lazar Kaganovich
Margaret Mead
Herbert Marcuse

How about political dynasties that supported the Arab Spring and Muslim Immigration?
Ralph Miliband (father)
Kevin Miliband (son)
Irving Krisol (father)
Bill Kristol (son)

How about Prime Ministers that committed the first white genocide?
Benjamin Disraeli

^^He also helped install the Oppenheimer family as a diamond cartel. To prevent white competition the Oppenheimers helped turn Rhodesia into Zimbabwe. They used the same strategy that Joe Slovo and his Litvaks used in South Africa.

Should we talk about anti-white, anti-Christian propagada?
Jed Sunden
Pussy Riot
Marat Gelman

Several of those people are mass murderers, but when it comes to naming names I didn't even scratch the surface. There are several problems with pointing out the facts, history, and behaviors even spanning 2,000 years.

#1 - Indoctrination: many people are so indoctrinated they're brain will short-circuit and they'll start frothing like Pavlov's Dog and screaming nonsense.
#2 - Intelligence: many people are simply not intelligent enough to hold this information in their brain, observe consistent patterns of behavior, and apply this. See #1 for the typical answers they've been fed.
#3 - De Facto and De Jure crimes: there are social stigmas that are repeatedly beaten over the head of every white person on earth. There are also laws and stigmas that prevent whites from forming groups, group identity, and acting in our collective self-interest. Finally, there are thought crimes that prevent whites who have used #2 to defeat #1 yet they cannot escape #3.

The biggest problem is #3. You can't help that most people will not figure this out on their own. That's just a fact of life. The problem is when #3 rears its ugly head you're paralyzed to do anything, to reach the dumb and indoctrinated. Just read these comments. They're completely indistinguishable from any Libtarded Defense of Islam. Just play the Word Swap Game and you'll see exactly what I mean. Swap Muslim for Jew and you'll find they're indistinguishable from a Libtarded Defense of Islam.

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews