Saturday, 2 November 2013
The Pew Research Center released a comprehensive and nuanced study on Oct. 1 about the character of the American Jewish community. The reaction here was typical Israeli apprehension about Jews’ place in the world, mixed with a general sense of confusion over how to interpret the results. Most discussions focused on two aspects: The high percentage of interfaith marriages and the vast support among American Jews for Israel.

Fifty-eight percent of Jews who married between 2005 and 2013 have a non-Jewish spouse. Mixed marriages inevitably lead to the assimilation of Jews into American culture, and tap long-standing Israeli fears over the future of the Jewish people. To some Israelis given to these worries, assimilation is tantamount to accepting annihilation.

Many took the news of the Pew report as evidence that Jews who do not live in Israel are putting the future of the “tribe” in danger. Some argued triumphantly that the antidote to assimilation of the Diaspora should naturally be a renewed focus on Zionism — the thesis that Jews can only live fully and safely in the Jewish homeland. It was opportunity for these Israelis to publicly gloat that their long-held ideas over the primacy of Zionism were validated.

“The only place in the world that enables multigenerational Jewish life … is the state of Israel,” the Israeli rabbi Noam Pearl wrote in the Maariv newspaper of the Pew report.

Yet it was impossible to avoid the survey’s bad news. The attention given to the fact that American Jews still care in great numbers about Israel — “about seven in ten American Jews (69%) say they are emotionally very attached (30%) or somewhat attached (39%) to Israel” — belies the sense of apprehension among Israelis about the sustainability of Jewish culture.

...In the committee meeting, Rabbi Gilad Kariv of the Reform movement, was one of those members who put a positive spin on the Pew findings, calling them a “victory of Zionism.” Kariv is hardly a hawkish nationalist, and he has close relations to Reform communities in North America. Nevertheless, he said that the findings prove that “the future of Jewish demographics depends on the Jewish state.”
Source: New York Times

I find it interesting that it is considered socially acceptable for Jews to describe marriage with non-Jews as "annihilation". If any Europeans expressed a similar sentiment about their own people, Jews, and quite possibly the very same ones, would not hesitate to call them Nazis. This is because Anti-Europeanism, which is the dominant ideology of the world, sees European peoplehood as a lesser thing than non-European peoplehood. Non-European peoplehood is something rich, deep and ancestral, whereas European peoplehood, according to this view, is defined by simple rules such as place of birth or possession of an administrative status called citizenship.

Let's be clear here. This is about genetics. There is no question of the Jews who "marry out" abandoning their religion. And the "culture" label is just a nod towards the mores of the times, intended to make concern about genetic purity seem more socially acceptable.

In general, the human mating impulse being what it is, the only way any people can maintain its own genetic continuity is to live concentrated within their own physical space. This ensures that the pool of potential mates likely to be encountered is substantially of the same genetic lineage. Absent ethnic homogeneity within an exclusive territory, in-group marriage can only be enforced by a rigorously exclusionist culture, often accompanied by physical controls on movement and interaction and strong social or legal sanctions, sometimes including violence, against those who refuse to comply.

For thousands of years, their ability to maintain their own genetic integrity without a territory of their own has been the "killer app" of the Jewish people, what uniquely distinguished them from all others. Looking at modern Mohammedan demographics in Europe, absent continued immigration and demographic dominance, there is little indication that the Muslims would be able to maintain their own separateness over the long term. Even the internal cultural enforcement mechanisms, including threats of violence, would almost certainly prove unavailing unless the Muslims achieved sufficient strength of numbers to assume political control of the territory.

The only people who have ever been able to maintain their own distinctness over the long term without governmental power are Jews. And, of course, this, in part, is what has led to their disproportionate support for multiculturalism, multiracialism and diversity. Confident in their killer app, a fiercely inward-looking and exclusionist culture, they believed that the corrosive effects of "diversity" would be felt only by others. But now the openness of European civilisation is affecting them too.

A recent article in the Jewish magazine Commentary acknowledged this. For all the bleating about antisemitism in Europe, the real threat to Jews comes not from Europeans being nasty to them, but being nice to them.
Despite the disheartening vilification of Israel, the biggest threat to long-term European Jewish survival is assimilation, not persecution or even prejudice.

European Jewish demographics since World War II ended show a pattern of decline that can be correlated to the degree of Jewish assimilation into the broader European
society. The more secular Jews are, the less children they tend to have.

...The fact is, European Jews are very much like their non-Jewish counterparts. They are assimilating into something–and their full embrace of the surrounding culture leads to
dwindling numbers of Jews for the next generation as a result of lower birth rates, intermarriage, lack of participation in communal life, lack of Jewish literacy, and the like. Their loss to the community means that communities become smaller over time–and larger religious families are not large enough to make up for those lost numbers.
Source: Commentary

Considering the social integration of American Jewry, even an in-group marriage rate of 42% is astonishingly high by any normal standards. It bespeaks massive subterranean cultural prejudice against the idea of marrying non-Jews. But all of the indicators point towards further assimilation and loss of Jewish uniqueness in future. At last Jews are forced to confront the truth that the rest of humanity has faced since the dawn of time: no people can exist without a territory of its own.

40 comments:

Anonymous said...

You write with alphabet letters invented by proto-Jews (Canaanites), about moral laws given you by old Jews (Commandments) and by Christianity (Yeshua Ha-Nozri), write about genetics where structure of DNA was discovered by a Jewess (Rosalind Franklin), using a computer which architecture was developed by a Jew (von Neumann).

And what you write looks like Spinosa’s sophistry, Freudian fantasies, and Kafkaesque hallucinations.
:)

Anonymous said...

@ 09.02
Your comment is just chutzpa esque flag waving- pr. You should be in advertising - you probably are. The tribe is very good at stealing other people ideas, ask Walt Disney how he feels about the tribe controlling the company he built- there are countless examples like that. As for the OT- Jews don't read it- they make jokes about it - current day Jews read the talmud. You know that - we all know that. The myth of Jewish exceptionalism is just that- a myth. The only plus Jews have got going for them is their ability to work together to achieve something. If white people displayed the same kind of group committment it would be a no contest.
I haven't read anything new in the Pew findings - twenty years ago it was expected that 50% would be lost, if the figure is now 58% lm sure the tribe will take this into and adjust the settings. Bear in mind that whenever Jews announce anything they do so with the volume turned right up and never spare the exaggeration.
Is anyone waiting for Jews to temper their diversity speak and declare open support for the continuing existence of the white race? I very much doubt it, they are against us.

Anonymous said...

Florida, USA - More Jew hating twaddle. If Jews marry within their own tribe, they are accused of perpetuating an alien supremacist culture. If Jews marry Europeans they are accused of trying to destroy the European race and culture. Jews make up 0.2 percent of the world population, moslems make up 23 percent. Jews contribute to civilization and progress, moslems have an opposite effect. People of European heritage need to stop blaming 0.2 percent of the world's population for their problems and look in a mirror instead.

Anonymous said...

Jews are the ethnic group, with ancestry influenced by their - very old - religious tradition.

but, what do you mean by "white race"?

I don't blame all non-Jews for anything, not for "stealing ideas".
what is yours, yours.
...

Anonymous said...

This is an excellent article, which illustrates well the double standards in jewry.

@ 2 November 2013 10:37

"If Jews marry within their own tribe, they are accused of perpetuating an alien supremacist culture. If Jews marry Europeans they are accused of trying to destroy the European race and culture."

Yes if they keep to themselves they are naturally not willing to assimilate. But if they mix they are not necessarily trying to dilute the gene pool of Europeans. They are on the one hand reasonably close genetically to other Europeans. Although they form a distinct genetic profile with semitic input due to their heavy inbreeding. And their numbers are so small as to have a negligeble effect.
So your claim is not correct at all.

Personally I think this Development is a good thing. Jews who wish to retain their tribal affiliation should leave for Israel. The rest should assimilate into the host population.

The worst result would be for jews to retain their seperate supremacist identity living in diaspora.

"Jews make up 0.2 percent of the world population, moslems make up 23 percent. Jews contribute to civilization and progress, moslems have an opposite effect."

This is the same fallacy repeated endlessly. Not just raw numbers matter. Economic, cultural and political power are also important. And jews have lots of influence in all these spheres in most of the western World. Especially in the US.

And it is true that jews have made many important Scientific contributions.
On the other hand, they have also been leading many destructive Developments.

For instance; Marxism, freudian psychology, critical theory, feminism, boasian anthropology, degenerate art, etc.

These cultural and pseudoscientific contributions have had an immense damage on the western World.



Reality Check said...

Israel is kicking out the aliens that have invaded their country. In Europe, the Jews are leading and supporting the alien invasion of 'their' country. Go figure.

Anonymous said...

You don't have to go out and shoot large numbers of an ethnic group in order to commit a genocide - "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" will get you to the same destination. One way to do that would be to introduce milions of non-whites into white countries and let nature take its course, however in order to remove the possibility of being accused of committing a genocide or advocating for same its a neat trick to convince the whites they don't exist. Which is exactly what has occurred - whites have been beaten down and cowed, most whites don't utter a peep of complaint. And it is the tribe owned and controlled media who have had the greatest hand in the de-legitimisation of the white race and the very same tribe owned and controlled media has convinced us we are racists and good only for blending out. Whites bad - multiculture good.
Whether the .2% have been living among the whites for 60 years or 600 the net affect is still negative, despite the overstated and grossly inflated claims to the contrary. Whites don't need anyone else around them in order to live well and prosper - we can manage perfectly well on our own. We don't owe the tribe anything. Its our success that attracts non-whites, including the tribe, who then try and convince us we cant live without them - oh and we owe them for all the harm we've caused them - not buying it, not interested, got too much self respect to fall for the same guilt garbage they've been duping us with for the last 60 years - way past its use by date.

Anonymous said...

"Jews who wish to retain their tribal affiliation should leave for Israel"

nice, and then you blame Jews for supremacism...

who are you to decide?
are you The Supreme White European?
can you prove it?

Oh and if you are so purist, don't forget to protect yourself from Jewish culture.
Don' dare to see last Thor movie - Nathalie Portman is Jewish.
No movies with Scarlett Johansson - she is Jewish, too. and Liz Taylor.
Don't listen to the music of Elvis Presley. or Dire Straights. Or TRex.

Don't dare study Electrodynamics - Hertz was a Jew.
And Thermodynamics - Boltzmann is there.
And Relativity.
And Quantum Mechanics - Bohr, Born were Jews.
And Mathematics - too many you-know-whom.

basically, if you want to get rid of Jewish influence and heritage, just sit in your hole an write hateful comments.

now couple of words for those who are capable of thinking, not only blowing mental bubbles - what is meant by "white race".

all humans have the same genes for melanin.
these genes are expressed in Africans, some Asians, Australian Aborigenes and Amerindians so their skin is dark, and blocked in Europeans and South Asians so they are light skinned.

skin colour is related to ancestry, but very crudely.
it is up to every person to decide how relevant it is.

many Jews have lighter skin than some Spaniards and Italians.
that is before everyone's eyes.
so just think a little before posting obvious tosh.
(but not if that mattered much anyway - a person is to be judged by the content of character.)
...

Anonymous said...

Florida, USA - Thats right, just keep moving the chairs around on the deck of the Titanic, obsessing over how the Jews (0.2 % of the world population) control everything. Part of what has made Western man successful has been the ability to deal with facts, even if it conflicts with tradition. The fact is that while you are wasting time looking for the boogy-man Jew under the bed, the inbred moron death worshiping moslem invaders are destroying your culture, laws and gene pool. Any blame for allowing this to happen lies at the feet of the European population who have allowed it to happen. Your ancestors didn't let the moslems get a foothold here, example: the Battle of Tours and the Battle of Lepanto.

Anonymous said...

"Jews see marriage to non-Jews as annihilation"

What religious group doesn't see marriage to nonmembers that way?! They all do! If we are going to pin things on the Joooos, let's make it stick and show that nonJews dont do the same things. Otherwise, the feeble-minded conspiracists go wild.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"Any blame for allowing this to happen lies at the feet of the European population who have allowed it to happen. Your ancestors didn't let the moslems get a foothold here, example: the Battle of Tours and the Battle of Lepanto."

We need to persuade them not to let it happen. And to do that we need to understand why they have allowed it to happen hitherto. The fundamental reason is that a bizarre, non-rational European guilt complex has built artfully constructed and maintained, with Jews playing a prominent part in its elaboration. Helping people see that and understand the hypocrisy and the ethnic self-interest that lies behind this demand for Europeans to disregard their own ethnic self-interest is part of the process involved in helping people to change. There is no solution to the problem of Islam without getting rid of the European guilt complex.

Your point about the Jewish share of the world population is petty. So what? Jews have won about a quarter of all the Nobel prizes ever awarded, so their intellectual influence is way out of proportion to their numbers. And the western world is being islamised because certain bad ideas have prevailed in elite circles.

Every time a European tries to do something that might stop the islamisation of the continent, there is a Jew waiting to hit him over the head with the Nazi stick, as we saw recently with Golden Dawn. It is perfectly reasonable to draw attention to the hypocrisy of people who obsess about the purity of their own genetic lineage yet demand that Europeans miscegenate and diversify.

Anonymous said...

more than 100 generations of my ancestors continuously lived in Europe.
that is longer than some of other European peoples.

Judaic traditions and contribution to the Western culture, both ancient and modern, are undeniable, formative, and continual.

there is also well-documented history of anti-Jewish persecution in Europe (but that wasn't unique, there were many other hostilities)

you might repeat ad nauseam your vague, obsessive and unsubstantiated conspiracy claims but that won't change basic facts.

you have no more rights for Europe than I do, and zero authority to tell me that I am undesirable.

you have, however, a possibility to see by your own eyes who poses the real threat to the Western civilization, both its Jewish and non-Jewish parts.

you also have possibility to stop your hate.
do you see the difference? - I don't hear any such proporsals from you, becuse first, you know that I don't hate non-Jews, as I never declared any hostile views.

I would like to live in peace and play non-zero sum.

and the second reason why I don't hear such proposals from you - that is because you chose a different goal, to convince non-Jewish Europeans again, that I am better off thrown out, or dead.

this is your free choice, - the unworthy choice.
live with it.
...

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"more than 100 generations of my ancestors continuously lived in Europe."

You can trace your direct ancestors back 2000 or more years? I find that hard to believe.

"you have no more rights for Europe than I do, and zero authority to tell me that I am undesirable."
Yes I do. I am European. You are non-European.

Do the Arabs resident in "Palestine" have as much moral entitlement to the land as Jews? Many of them have lived there for longer than the Jews in Israel. You deny that European peoplehood exists and you deny Europeans the right to a home of their own, but you demand those things for Jews.

If you can't acknowledge the obvious fact that Jews are disproportionately involved in pushing multiculturalism, diversity and pro-immigrationism, and that islamisation is the consequence of this, then you are so bereft of either honesty or judgement that you don't deserve to be taken seriously by anyone.

Anonymous said...

"You can trace your direct ancestors back 2000 or more years? I find that hard to believe."

"Yes I do. I am European. You are non-European."

do you see? - you apply the very same logic to get diffferent conclusions that you need.

can YOU trace your direct ancestors back 2000 or more years?
how can YOU be sure that there was not a single non-"European" among them?
that is even not talking about your inability to define what it actually means.

"Jews pushing islamization" - is that what should be "taken seriously"?
:)

Jews were persecuted by Islam for as long as Islam exists, they came to Spain trying to escape Muslim slaughter in North Africa.

the only lethal violence against Jews today, is strictly by the hands of Muslims.
Israel is de facto at war with every Muslim country - BTW the only state clearly winning this war. take a note and follow the f***ing example.

you don't have a single example of a Jew "pushing multiculturalism, diversity and pro-immigrationism" and having definite gains for any Jewish community.

here is George Galloway - the one who created Bradford Islamist hub and promoted many others, darling of Hamas, the evil clown on the pay of Iranian regime.
to your displeasure, he is "European" non-Jew, and, what a surprise, the anti-Semite.

your thoughts are in disarray man.
...

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"can YOU trace your direct ancestors back 2000 or more years?
how can YOU be sure that there was not a single non-"European" among them?"

So in other words you can't trace your ancestors back 2000 years at all. I certainly can't trace mine. Nor does it matter whether I have had an ancestor who wasn't European within the last 2000 years. The question is whether I self-identify as belonging to a European people. I do. Outsiders can come and be absorbed into the tribe. Many Jews have done that and are now Europeans. You, however, self-identify as belonging to a non-European people, the Jews. Therefore you are not European.

""Jews pushing islamization" - is that what should be "taken seriously"?
:)"
There are some Jews pushing islamisation. For the most part, however, Jews don't push it directly. They push immigration, diversity, multiculturalism. Islamisation is simply the secondary, unintended effect of this.

"Jews were persecuted by Islam for as long as Islam exists, they came to Spain trying to escape Muslim slaughter in North Africa."
That's a grotesque falsehood. Jews were in Spain even in pre-Roman times, before Islam existed. The Jews are the ones who incited the Muslims to invade Spain and collaborated with them when they did. See the series of posts I have made on this subject.

"you don't have a single example of a Jew "pushing multiculturalism, diversity and pro-immigrationism" and having definite gains for any Jewish community."

That's a curiously worded statement. "and having definite gains for any Jewish community"? In general, Jews seem to feel that they gain from making European societies less European. They seem to feel that they will be safer in a country where "everyone is a minority". Whether this is true or not is beside the point. If they believe it's true, they will act in pursuit of that objective.

You assume that Jews would only pursue a policy that was rational and demonstrably operating to their benefit. But Jewish judgement isn't that finely tuned. History is littered with examples of Jewish schemes that went catastrophically awry for their intended victims and for the Jews. The Muslim invasion of Spain, which was supported by Jews, ultimately resulted in all of the Jews being expelled from Spain. Communism ultimately resulted in antisemitism predominating in much of eastern Europe, as well as the Holocaust. So multiculturalism and immigrationism will be just another mad scheme aimed at warding off antisemitism that only ended up provoking it further.

Anonymous said...

CZ:
"The question is whether I self-identify as belonging to a European people. I do."

good.
self-identifying is reasonable starting point, that is what I previously named “culturally European” – meaning not entirely genetic.

but the whole issue is, again, - the European culture is REALLY in considerable part, have Judaic roots, components, influences and developments.
most important, - in the written tradition, Christianity, and science.

so I do identify myself as a Westerner, the European of mixed Russian/Jewish ancestry, the same way as somebody else is a European of Irish or Greek or Hungarian :) ancestry. I love both Russian and Jewish people, love European culture, but think it is better to keep it free of anti-Semitism, or anti-Russianism, or anti-Hungarianism, - free of hate, briefly.
wasn't it enough already?
as you see I wish only good things to you. :)

are you ready to bury the hatchet?

now this, - again these nameless “Jews … making European societies less European”.
can you spell at least one name?
at least one achievement of that mythical “Jewish islamization”?

is that when couple of Jews went to mosque in France, had free coffee there?

can you compare that with George Galloway’s pro-Muslim Respect party?

David Cameron establishing Islamic finance in the City, appointing a wolfskin radical Sayeeda Warsi as religious affairs minister?

lefti pro-Islamic Nazis from UAF – is there at least one Jew among them?

Boris Johnson declaring himself “first muslim mayor of London”?

Ken Livingstone, welcoming jihadi Tzar Yusuf Qaradawi?

disingenuous BBC anchors like David Dimbleby, Jeremy Paxman, who are really hysterical about suicidal “diversity”.

(No they are all non-Jews).

be specific please, name at least one nasty Islamic Jew. :)
it will make your writings extremely credible.

Anonymous said...

CZ:
"Communism ultimately resulted in antisemitism predominating in much of eastern Europe, as well as the Holocaust".

Anti-Semitism was in Eastern Europe way before the raise of Communism, unfortunately.
Bogdan Khmelnicki was dubbed “17 century’s Hitler” by Jewish historians.
Russian Tzar’s administration put draconian limitations on Jewish life.

Holocaust was a result not of Communism but (rather side-effect) of Germanic supremacism, which had the roots in the WW1 defeat, and even deeper back – Franco-Prussian and Napoleonic wars. plus psychotic obsession of Fuhrer by Jews.

Nazi Germany collaborated with Stalin in 1939-40 (Ribbentrop-Molotov pact), at the same time putting Jews to concentration camps. If Communist USSR was, as you say, under the full governance of Jews, then why did it collaborate with Jew-hating Nazis?

so this your one-liner is neither factually, nor logically true.

Anonymous said...

I consider myself as antifascist and thefefore I ' m against Kuran and Old testament teachings,but most of all,against the theocracy states which are based on Kuran. Israel is a democracy. It is not a fascist state and the judaism has become only folklore. I recomend a greate peace of wisdom in the last book of Freud "Moses and monotheism". All the best and down with the islamofascists

Anonymous said...

@ 2nov 13.56
Yes it is true many jews are light skinned - for many hundreds of years theyve been taking white gentile women for breeding.purposes- the recently released dna study proves this. They've been using whites to improve their racial stock- much as farmers do. Prof. Martin Richards study proves what has long been suspected though the conclusions he draws are obviously suspect. On the female side ashkenazi jews have a strong white component. This throws up the paradoxical dilemma: jewish ness is supposedly passed down the female line - these turkic ashkenazis are obviously a confused lot. That they now constitute the majority of jews is doubly troubling for real jews.

Anonymous said...

A white who is too timid or afraid to call.himself a white is in fact an anti-white. If you want to defer to those who are colonising us the first step on the road to serfdom is not calling yourself a white. Using the term "european" often plays into the hands of the colonisers - be a man- or a woman - call yourself a white and see how quickly your dignity is restored within yourself - its the best therapy you can have and its free.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

I don't agree. In fact, I consider the black/white dichotomy to be part of the conceptual toolkit of anti-European ideology. It implicitly pits Europeans against the rest of the human race, lumping people as diverse as Chinese, Africans and Indians into some imaginary confrontation with us. It also represents another kind of genocide in that it negates European peoplehood, erasing Frenchness, Germanness, Spanishness, etc. and substituting a simplistic racial categorisation.

If "white" doesn't mean "European", what does it mean? Some Europeans have darker skins than some non-Europeans, so even in a purely descriptive sense it is inaccurate. Use of the term "white" simply plays into the hands of the oppressors of the European peoples.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"be specific please, name at least one nasty Islamic Jew. :)
it will make your writings extremely credible."

Demanding evidence that Jews are involved in promoting and maintaining the intellectual infrastructure of multiculturalism strikes me as like demanding evidence that fire is hot. But since people keep doing it, I will prepare a comprehensive dossier on the topic for future publication.

For now, I will single out the Runnymede Trust, an organisation, founded by two Jews, that has been a driving force in promoting multiculturalism in Britain. It was in a report published by the Runnymede Trust that the term Islamophobia first surfaced in modern English-language discourse. The term was coined, I believe, by the Jew Richard Stone.

See the post I made about the topic here.

Anonymous said...

Cheradenine Zakalwe,
You write about the guilt complex which has been forced on Europeans. This is true. And the number one cause of this guilt complex is the never ending holocaust propaganda. Are the crimes of Stalin and the soviet communists mentioned on a daily basis? No but the holocaust is. The holocaust is the number one propaganda weapon of the Jewish supremacists. Arm yourself with facts. Watch the documentaries here - http://codoh.com/library/categories/1167 No one has explained how if the holocaust claims of a genocide are true then why do they need a special law to protect them from criticism. No other historical event needs such a law. What have they got to hide? Watch the documentaries and see for yourself how you have been lied to.

Anonymous said...

CZ:
"See the post I made about the topic here."

It is very hard to get through double and triple inverted logic of that post..

CZ:
“The term [“Islamophobia”] was coined, I believe, by the Jew Richard Stone.”

The term “genocide” was also coined by a Jew, - so what?
You do use it all the time.
:)

Just don’t get it – is that supposed to be the proof that ALL THE EUROPEAN JEWS are responsible for the Islamization of Europe?
Wow.

CZ:
"For now, I will single out the Runnymede Trust, an organisation, founded by two Jews, that has been a driving force in promoting multiculturalism in Britain."

Even if true and there are such couple of Jewish idiots somewhere, - how might that be compared with the concerted, prolonged, and increasingly triumphalist multi-billion £ sponsored, Saudi and Qatari (+Iranian on the competing side) takeover of Britain by the ACTUAL Islamization?

Anyway, - with your now proven propensity for hate, truth denial, lies, double standards, and demagoguery – that will be priceless reading no doubt.

Anonymous said...

CZ we talk a lot and ponder but at the same time we are more aware of the monumental and historic demographic changesoccurring in the Western countries - more aware than 99% of the population. It is all well and good to want to be non-confrontational and to eschew compartmentalising racial groups but the undeniable reality is the numbers are changing for the whites with what is near lightning speed. Whites need to realise this and start embracing their white identify - if they don't commence to value their white identity they will see no benefit in fighting to ensure the continuing existence of the white race. Interestingly most members of every other racial group aren't shy about proclaiming their identity - and while most whites don't consciously acknowledge their whiteness - to themselves - every other racial group looks at us as whites. White libtards disparage racially aware whites as racists but the majority of those of other races with whom the libtards identify make no or little distinction - to them white is white irrespective of ones political leanings. When the mayhem starts in earnest the libtards will be forced to understand their folly (as many already have understood as non-white crime spirals out of control in the white countries) - but by then it will probably be too late to act on the lesson.
When a black guy looks at you in the street CZ the first thing he thinks is "white". He doesn't even think it consciously - but in some primeval recess of his mind a signal is sounded. You cant escape your identity - to resile from it doesn't help our cause - better to proclaim and celebrate it. Whether or not members of other racial groups have a probem with that isn't relevant. We've been pandering to other racial groups since the sixties and look where that's got - facing extinction. You don't have to go about boasting white superiority - but we do need to embrace our identity. In an ideal world the only people who would have a problem with that would be people who wish us ill - but right now wishing ill upon the white race is the default setting in the West. We have to relearn what it is to be ourselves - if that's what it takes to ensure our survival. We could do worse than embrace taquiya (as the Mindweapon suggests) - whatever we've been doing up until now hasn't worked for us. Personally l don't have a problem with lying to our colonisers and using the same tactics they employ against us - on them. It is essential that we fully comprehend how much we are in danger - l don't think most aware whites really understand we could be gone from the planet within 50 years if the current trends are maintained - gone as a meaningful and self sustaining racial group. This is the reality. The urgency of our situation means we should probably do away with the niceties. The Latin root of the word "nice" is stupid. When survival itself is at stake everything changes.

Anonymous said...

Are you implying that the White race does not exist by using quotes? Are you saying that given a Congolese African and a native Swede standing side by side that you could not tell them apart? Very simply, get yourself onto a search engine and find out about the "white race."

You really come off as a leftist tool on this website. A promoter of enrichment and diversity. Also, unable to stand the slightest criticism of Jews.

BTW, with all this "marrying out" business, what is a "Jew?"
/sarc

Anonymous said...

Google:
"The term “Islamophobia” was coined a just over a century ago. The first recorded use of the word was in 1912, in French."

"The term "Islamophobia" was first coined in 1922 by Etienne Dinet, a French Orientalist painter who throughout his career became interested in Arabic culture and Islam."

Looking at http://www.runnymedetrust.org/ -
one can notice that, - despite it is definitely a MC/PC trashcan, but in no sense a synagogue.

clearly a majority of Runnymede's white-skinned European-looking fellows are non-Jews.

can I blame all European non-Jews for Islamization?

or, if to apply your logic - even a couple of European non-Jews there, are enough to blame all of them for Islamization, as they are vile and can't be trusted because of this and that (see the list of their misdeeds and collusions above, BTW much more substsantial than the "Jewish driving force" fairytale).

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

You're getting boring. Try harder. Or get some higher-performing member of the tribe in to do a better job.

"The term “Islamophobia” was coined a just over a century ago. The first recorded use of the word was in 1912, in French."

"The term "Islamophobia" was first coined in 1922 by Etienne Dinet, a French Orientalist painter who throughout his career became interested in Arabic culture and Islam."

Hence the qualification "in modern English-language discourse".

"can I blame all European non-Jews for Islamization?"

You can make whatever claim you want. Hopefully you will be able to back it up with evidence rather than simply accusing everyone who disagrees with you of being evil. That is the standard of European discourse.

As I have said, Jews are "disproportionately involved" in promoting multiculturalism and immigrationism. But you Jews show no such nuance when talking about "European" antisemitism based on the fact that Hitler killed some of you. You freely insinuate that somehow every European bears some measure of guilt for this. Why do we have corporate responsibility but you don't?

Anonymous said...

3 November 2013 10:02

As it was said above on this page:

"Jews are the ethnic group, with the ancestry influenced by their - very old - religious tradition."

The origin of Jewish people is believed to be in the Bronze age Mesopotamia.
Historically, the majority of Jews were Europeanized, - genetically, geographically, and culturally, and very long ago (2000 years ago at lleast).

Are you happy?

on the "white race" - again, the machinery of white skin is in the homologous genes for melanin and its regulation.
certainly, the down-regulated melanin in some people, is the reality.
the significance of that "white race" is - subjective, you can think whatever you wish.

my own perception is that, - when you meet a group of 10 young black men on the dark street, it isn't the same as if you see 10 Japanese men.
as there is lot of human evolutionary difference between these two groups.

but when you hear a Theoretical Physics lecture, it doesn't matter if your Professor is black or white, it only matters if he is good.
...

Anonymous said...

Tim Wise (high profile Jewish antti-white) doesn't say "We must abolish the European race". Tim Wise says "We must abolish the white race".
Susan Sontag (jewish anti-white essayist) didn't say "The European race is the cancer of human history". Susan Sontag said "The white race is the cancer of human history". With all due respect our enemies know who they are gunning for and they don't muck around.

Anonymous said...

CZ:
"You freely insinuate that somehow every European bears some measure of guilt for this"

(you mean European non-Jew certainly).

Where did I say that?
To the contrary, I proposed already three or four times - to end hostility and blame.
Got silence in response.

And again an implication that I am somehow less European than you, despite you are unable to prove it in any way.
...

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

You plural. Jews.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"Tim Wise (high profile Jewish antti-white) doesn't say "We must abolish the European race". Tim Wise says "We must abolish the white race".
Susan Sontag (jewish anti-white essayist) didn't say "The European race is the cancer of human history". Susan Sontag said "The white race is the cancer of human history". With all due respect our enemies know who they are gunning for and they don't muck around."

Yes, those who wish to destroy the European peoples adopt a conceptual framework designed to facilitate that objective, one that implicitly forces Europeans into a confrontation with the entire rest of the human race: white vs. black, with black defined so broadly as to encompass anyone who isn't European. But why should have to fight the entire rest of the human race? By adopting their conceptual framework, you are doing their job for them.

Anonymous said...

Hello to Anonymous who made the comment on 2 November 2013 16:53
"you don't have a single example of a Jew "pushing multiculturalism, diversity and pro-immigrationism" and having definite gains for any Jewish community"

Please look this up (It is a comment made by me). How do you respond to that?

islamversuseurope.blogspot.ca/2013/10/to-walk-between-raindrops.html
Hello,
what about Henryk Broder, who is a prominent german jewish counterjihad Person? Does he not support Cheradine Zakalwe claims?

Just two quotes from him to show his true Colors:

Henryk Broder: “Ich glaube tatsächlich, dass Europa ein übernahmereifer Kontinent ist… Ich finde es grundsätzlich gut, dass das so genannte “weisse, heterosexuelle, blonde, arische” Europa seinem Ende entgegengeht.” Quelle: Berner Zeitung, 8.2.2007

Translated: I truly believe that europe is a continent ripe for taking.. I truly find it good that the so called White heterosexual aryan europe finally marches to ist end..

¦„Was ich völlig im Ernst gut finde ist, daß diese demografische Struktur Europas nicht mehr zu halten ist. Je eher die Europäer das einsehen, desto besser. Einige Städte sind schon recht farbig und nicht mehr ‚arisch‘ weiß, und dagegen kann man überhaupt nichts sagen. […] Ich würde gerne das weiße Europa aufgeben, aber ich würde ungern das demokratische Europa aufgeben.“ – Broder über historischen Masochismus, arabische Logik und die Entarisierung Europas: ‚Europa wird anders werden‘, Interview in tacheles vom 14. Juli 2006.
www.hagalil.com/archiv/2006/07/europa.htm

What I truly and seriously find good is that the demographic structure europe can no longer be supported. The earlier the europeans accept this, the better. Some cities are now truly colourful and no longer aryan white and you cannot say anything against it... I would be glad to give up white Europe, but i would loathe it to give up democratic Europe.

Anonymous said...

@Anonymous 3 November 2013 13:06

Good point. Counter-jihad jew Henryk Broder is a good example of an anti-european jew.

On the one hand professing to be a noble defender of "democracy", but at the same time celebrating the demise and dispossesion of the White man from his homelands.

His wording and phrasing shows that he is actually a cultural marxist at Heart.

This filthy vermin should be despised for what he is; an enemy of the Europeans.

Anonymous said...

Plenty of people from Muslim backgrounds self identify as European. Kanye West self identifies as a genius. Surely that definition of identity is a bit post-modern?

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

When I say identify, I mean they would have to regard themselves as being indistinguishable from the rest of the European population they are surrounded by and be so regarded by them. No Muslim I am aware of meets that criterion. Insofar as they profess a European identity, they regard it as a superficial thing based on citizenship, with their deeper "peoplehood" identity underneath.

Anonymous said...

3 November 2013 13:06
=> Henryk Broder etc.

Good at least something.
The Jewish college dropout obsessed by the anti-white sentiments, exactly as others here are obsessed by white supremacy.

Now look at the list I presented in my post above (2 November 2013 19:44 ) and try to compare.
Does he participate, in practice, in building an infrastructure of islamization? No.
Is he connected to Islamic financial sources? No.
Does he represent anybody except for his damaged ego? No.

Ask any Jew on any street in any Western city, if he/she wants more Islam and more third world immigration – the answer will be decisive No.

Now on self-identifying.
There is no problem with self-identification if it is supported by the broad communal consensus.

So when CZ says “European” based on self-identifying, he implies “the anti-Semite of (very widely understood) European ancestry”. It isn’t even clear if he includes American anti-Semites.
I wrote “anti-Semite” because simply being non-Jewish isn’t enough – to qualify as “European”, YOU MUST, specifically, deny any connection of Jews to Europe, be it cultural or genetic.
Otherwise you will be labelled as traitor and lectured and intimidated until you agree.(exactly what CZ is doing now on this site).
Other words, he chooses his identity to be a genocidal weapon against Jews.

Other bloggers here mean “White-skinned non-Jews” when mentioning “Whites”, and so on.

How broad is the support among Westerners for all these absurd claims?
I think it is minute.
But the life will tell.

My advise to all anti-Semites, if you hate Jews – great, then go and join Hamas at the Gaza fence, and try to do something about it. Sorry for not very nice company but there are no other allies for you in this case. :)
Good luck and the sooner, the better.
(and by “good” I mean an outcome that reduces the amount of evil in the world).

Anonymous said...

WARNING:
don't press the link if it is forbidden to you to hear the music written by a Jew.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxpN-6dbP7s
...

Anonymous said...

Hey Cheradenine Zakalwe, just an idea.

Search

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews