Wednesday, 21 August 2013
I wrote MP Søren Espersen from Danish Peoples' Party if they would demand that the MB be put on the Danish list of terror organisations. He agreed and is now asking our foreign minister to do so:

"Question to the Minister of Foreign Affairs. By Søren Espersen (Danish Peoples' Party):
"Will the government make sure that the international Islamistic movement, The Muslim Brotherhood, is put on the list of terror organisations?"
If you can, please ask your politicians to do the same. 

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dear Nicolai. The Dutch government is led by the Liberals (VVD) and Socialists (PvdA). Both are notorious ass kissers of Brussels. There is no way, minister of foreign affairs, Frans Timmerman, or PM Mark Rutte will do one simple move with out asking permission from the Opper Soviet of the EUSSR.

Anonymous said...

You gotta read this comment lol!
"Islam is not a culture but a body of principals and universal values. British Muslims are enriching for the whole society. From the Middle Ages, Islam has participated in the building of a European as well as British consciousness. The influence of Islamic civilisation on the literary and philosophical traditions is innumerable."
Iftikhar Ahmad
http://politics.co.uk/news/2013/08/19/chief-rabbi-multiculturalism-is-over#comment

Joe Daniels said...

There appears to have been a time in Spain in medieval times when Islam was more enriching than degrading. But as Andrew Marr points out in his History of the World, the same thing happened as every other time that Islam has developed a relatively pluralistic culture: jihadis invaded and snuffed it out.

Anonymous said...

There's little point in getting yet another Moslem so-called 'extremist' group outlawed whilst deliberating avoiding presenting a valid case for proscription of islam and deportation of all Moslems. It's the Muslim Brotherhood today, yesterday it was Hamas, then al-Qaeda, once it was Hizb-ut-Tahrir. The problem and the threat is Islam and Moslems. The reason this is never truly addressed is because any mention of 'deportation' is guaranteed to bring in allusions to nazism and 'final solutions' with the inference that Europeans/Westerners are "really" secret monsters longing for an excuse for bloodbaths. That has worked a real treat in ensuring that Europeans dance around the existential threat with these minor tactics (such as banning a group); in the meantime, the West's two greatest enemies conduct a pincer movement, one group is historically at the forefront of shutting down our freedom of speech and encouraging 'open borders' and immigration laws favouring Third World emigration, and the other uses brute force to enforce our silence and accommodation.

Anonymous said...

To Joe Daniels: the only 'enriching' bit about Islam in Spain was the Jizya (a tax as a form of protection monies) that Moslems demanded of Christians and Jews living under Islamic rule (usually between 80-150% of their incomes). It was designed to make the parasitic Moslems well off and force conversion to Islam as a way of escaping impoverishment through this tax. Moslem rulers tended to depend upon Christians and Jews to run their governments because they were better educated and accustomed to administration and proper governance; Islam's denial of free will and freedom of speech has been a hindrance to Islamic countries' development for most of its history. Jihad is "holy warfare to establish the religion" --- it is NOT an aberration. What put an end to Islam in Spain was the eventual Reconquista of Spain by its Christian peoples after almost 700 years of Islamic domination which left almost no signs of 'islamic civilisation' apart from a few buildings (most of them built over Christian churches).

Anonymous said...

To Anonymous @07:17: I read that short article. The Chief Rabbi in Britain is engaging in Jewish taqiyya and kitman. He's contrasting Jews and Moslems in their supposedly different views of living amongst non-Jewish/non-Moslem peoples and says that Jews chose to live 'under non-Jewish jurisdiction.' Not so: Jews even under the Romans were conducting their own courts and jurisprudence, sometimes in violation of Roman law and in mainly Christian European countries they set up their own ghettos and had their own courts and laws and still do (those courts were rightly seen as seditious by certain European governments). One of the reasons Islam has secured such a hold in the West is because Jews before them developed their own parallel systems: Beth Din courts paved the way for the acceptance of Sharia courts; Kosher food/non-edible products made Halal more acceptable; circumcision (which was sold to Christians as a practice for their babies as well as Jewish ones on spurious medical grounds) made islamic mandated male circumcision AND female genital mutilation accceptable (in fact, the excuse that circumcision 'prevented' sexual disorders/misconduct was used in the 1950s in the West to support FGM). And, worst of all, Jewish support and influence in drafting and passing anti-free speech legislation ('hate speech' laws) was the foundation for a total lock-down on discussion and criticism of Islam.

Search

Loading...

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews