Wednesday, 24 July 2013




This happened in Torrevieja, in Alicante, Spain. It's shameful the way the police just run away when the negroes attack them.


31 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is the wet dream of Cecilia Malmstrom, Daniel Cohn - bandit and EP friends. Europe must be in the near future an overcrowded sardin box filled with African niggers and friends of Mister Allah.

Maria José said...

DESCARRILAMIENTOS DE TRENES en Canadá, Francia, y ahora en España.........¿Atentados terroristas de musulmanes?

Anonymous said...

The police have guns, why don't they use them against people attacking them? Are their hands tied by political rules of engagement?

Roni said...

Dear readers.
As much as I can judge from the video’s; dealing with those African niggers is no work for the regular police. Police is for keeping order in normal situation. When matters escalate that way, you better bring armed units into the area and clean it by force. Every country has the right to defend itself against intruders. The border between the USA and Mexico, along the Rio Grande, is not only guarded by police. Heavily armed civil volunteers are patrolling the area along the river. They have no trouble to shoot if needed.

Roni said...

Dear readers.
As much as I can judge from the video’s; dealing with those African niggers is no work for the regular police. Police is for keeping order in normal situation. When matters escalate that way, you better bring armed units into the area and clean it by force. Every country has the right to defend itself against intruders. The border between the USA and Mexico, along the Rio Grande, is not only guarded by police. Heavily armed civil volunteers are patrolling the area along the river. They are not too shy to shoot if needed.

chimoio said...

I spend a lot of time patiently explaining to people that the anti jihad movement is not racist,then I come on here and there is a twat posting about "african niggers"and you allow it!shame on you,or do you at"islam versus europe"think this kind of damaging fuckwittery is o.k.? when people label us as racist,hey Iv'e got a good idea put a couple of ss runes on the page as well!

Anonymous said...

wheres my comment gone! it was up for a few seconds
what happened did I touch a a nerve?
oh well, try this one....
fuck you roni you racist fuckwit and fuck you islam versus europe for posting shit that damages the anti jihad movement,then again maybe that's the idea

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

You're obviously an idiot. You're comment hasn't been deleted. There is free speech here. If you don't like it, go back to the establishment media and look for the crumbs of truth you find there.

Try freeing your mind from its conditioning. Stop looking for pats on the head from the establishment that aren't going to come.

Everyone is a racist, or no one is a racist, depending on exactly how racism is defined. Only a fool would take seriously a label capable of being applied so broadly. If you accept the conceptual framework the elite impose on you, they have already won.

jayd said...

Why do some folks get all worked up over the use of the 'N' word?
It's a very descriptive word that in these times especially fit. People do not choose what race or what color they born with. But the do choose what they later become. And too many negros choose to later become niggers. That's a choice they make all alone. And of course in turn make 'racists' out of many people who never thought they would be. How many people wake up one fine morning and say to themselves, oh. This looks like a good day to become something. Hmmm. Lets see. Oh I know. I'll be a racist. Come on.
Anyway, I see nothing wrong in it actually. Foe example, I always had a preference for Chinese and Japanese and Korean women. That word preference I suppose could make me a racist in the eyes of some.
As for the mob of lice in this video, they are most assuredly niggers of the worst sort but worse yet. They are a mob, and the only way to properly handle a mob, is to exterminate it. Otherwise, the authorities simply encourage them do more of the same. They are not actually human simple because they can stand upright and walk just like humans. Monkeys can do that also.

jayd said...

apologies for missed words in my comment above. I was typing too fast, trying to keep up with my thoughts and did not proof read first. My mistake.

chimoio said...

so "I'm obviously an idiot"? tell you what run this thread past tommy robinson of the english defence league ask him what he thinks,he gets called a "racist" constantly,ask him if he thinks its OK to call people "niggers "lice",ask him if it matters to the movement you fuckwits,go back to "the establishment media"how dare you, you patronising cunt!might I suggest you go to stormfront or the BNP or the nearest nazi "dirty jew" hating sites, your'e as bad as the fuckin mslims

chimoio said...

jayd its not about "getting worked up"and if you can't understand why I'm posting about this then you really are thick,if you do understand yet still insist that it's not important then you are an enemy of the anti jihad movement and no better than a troll, and that goes for the admin of this site,

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

Yeah, because Tommy Robinson is my great leader. ROFL. The English Defence League are so politically correct, it's embarrassing. And what do all their efforts to demonstrate how nice and "non-racist" they are get them? Nothing.

This isn't just about resisting Islam. It's about defending European civilisation. Try exploring the root causes of what's happening to us instead of just reacting to the symptoms. One of them is the repression of free speech. And in that regard, it's you who is "as bad as the fuckin muslims".

Anonymous said...

Profanity, as well as epithets, obscure the discussion and issue. The person most 'liberal' with both on this thread is the person complaining of everyone else's comments, while supposedly here only to defend the "anti-jihad" or "counter-jihad" opposition (hardly a true 'movement') to Islamic incursion and destruction of our countries and civilisation.

I read a typical example of polite conversation at a cj site the other day, on a subject which is quite serious and, if properly understood, should be the subject of a genuine "counter-jihad" initiative. Unfortunately, the cj whatever is self-restricted so nothing will be done. The issue is HALAL and KOSHER products (edible and non-edible) and since this thread is about 'illegal market traders', it seems an appropriate point to introduce the subject.

Halal and Kosher aren't illegal, they've become mainstream over decades, even centuries, usually without people knowing this (and the EU aids this by ensuring food labelling procedures do not involve informing if the product is halal/kosher). The production, certification, advertising and selling of halal/kosher are both major revenue sources to their adherents. We are most conscious of halal because we recognise it as a form of our 'islamisation.' Many people object, rightly, to both h and k slaughter as unnecessarily cruel but that is as far as the argument is allowed to proceed. The true danger to us, and the main reason halal business is so important to islam, is because profits from it form part of an individual Moslem's income and, under the mandates of the Koran (9:60) some of that income MUST be donated to ZAKAT ('charity' or 'alms'). That ZAKAT, in turn, is used for several purposes also listed in K 9:60 and among them are for "fighting in the Cause of Allah" (to wage Jihad). There are now innumerable legal cases in Europe, US, Canada etc where this ZAKAT has been proved to form part of the funding which underpins Jihad in all forms against Westerners. The World Halal Congress has stated that halal will conquer the world. We are funding warfare against ourselves and yet the 'counter-jihad' never mentions this fact. This silence may, in part, be due to the fact that to do so would also invite discussion of the cruelty of kosher slaughter and also of the fact that trillions in profits accrue from the kosher certification which is regulated on a very high range of edible and non-edible products worldwide and also questions as to the use of these profits. (It should be noted that the amount of products, edible and non-edible, which are produced under certification as halal/kosher are far in excess of what their own adherents would be expected to consume, so it is obvious that these procedures (slaughter, employment, certification, advertising, selling) exist for monetary gain from the larger populations. Also, concerning edible products, those parts of animals considered unsuitable for consumption by moslems or jews are sold on further into the wider commercial market and there is also the issue of health procedures and risks involved in these forms of animal slaughter.

Yes, the illegal market traders should have their activities closed down, and deported, too, but there's a far bigger and more dangerous issue being ignored in its fullness by people who seem more concerned with polite and evasive discourse.

Maria José said...

Cheradenine, aquí te dejo el enlace a una noticia en el periódico izquierdista "20 Minutos" que muestra que los españoles estamos hartos de ser invadidos.

La noticia es de la muerte de dos invasores en la valla de Melilla.

De 299 comentarios, 292 censurados. Por supuesto, esos 292 comentarios censurados eran en contra de los invasores.

http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1881222/0/inmigrantes-muertos/marruecos-melilla/salto/



chimoio said...

CZ I only mention t robinson as an example of someone in the public eye that is constantly being called a racist, as indeed I am myself,he's not my "leader" either,you didn't address what I said re causing damage to other[ er, what shall I call them ?]people that don't like islam either?] you know full well what I mean by "movement"what's PC for you?"resistance"is that good enough for you? the EDL you say is an embarrassment,so who else of the people that don't like islam and let everyone know it is an embarrasment? beside your righton self of course! spencer geller dear old pat condell and the rest,do tell...no political party? that's a good idea! we are anti islam and we don't exclude people that think "niggers should be exterminated"wonder how far you'd get with that as a manifesto? paul weston has a vid extant titled "I am a racist",deals with what I'm banging on about here in a way,he's got a political part as well!is he a PC embarrasment?you seem to be in the same business as the msm the business of dividing people that should be united,IE you are the only one going about whatever it is you are doing in the right way,
what are you actually doing/ ok you havea website that chronicles the death cult islam,so what!lot's of people are doing that..what lots of people are not doing is potentially feeding grist into the msm mill that you profess to despise!who's side are you on?and please no bs about the unimportance of words, this site is called islam VERSUS europe that's two sides,which one are you on?

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

You say Tommy Robinson spent 11 minutes being accused of racism. I watched the video. As you said yourself, he continually asked "How am I a racist?". They didn't answer him. They didn't supply any proof. They couldn't. It didn't matter. They didn't need any. They spent 11 minutes accusing him of having impure motivations. And he spent 11 minutes insisting that his motivations were pure. And it availed nothing.

You say if one of his accusers had seen a comment on this website, they could have used it as evidence that he was a racist, based on a presumed association between people who post comments on this website and him. Even ignoring the absurdity of that association, you're missing the point. They didn't need any evidence. So your endless dancing around, trying to play by the establishment rules, achieves nothing.

Perhaps challenging the idea of racism or the validity of a culture that insists on assessing the merits of political propositions by speculating about the presumed moral purity of those making them would be more productive than accepting the conceptual framework that the establishment offers you.

You say I am being divisive. You come to this website, demand that I suppress someone else's freedom so that an ex-football hooligan can derive some ethereal benefit from it in future to what end isn't clear since he is proposing nothing that would stop or reverse the islamisation of Europe; and then, when I decline to do so, accuse me and commenters on this website of being morally and politically impure and claim that we are tainting you by association even though we have nothing to do with you. So who is being divisive here?

The problem of Islam in our midst is entirely caused by people like you: people obsessed about their rarefied ethical standards; people who draw Us/Them lines dividing their own ancestral kin group based on political prejudice and absurd notions like racism; people who want to suppress the freedom of their designated outgroup whose motivations they deem to be impure; people terrified of having stigmatising labels attached to them like "racist", "Islamophobe", "antisemite", "bigot".

The nature of life in a totalitarian system is that it induces fear. Fear is corrosive. It corrupts morals. It corrupts the intellect. People persuade themselves that they believe the lies they have to believe to escape punishment. In general, people find it easier to face physical danger than to go against the consensus of their peer group.

Tommy Robinson goes around saying the problem isn't Islam, it's "radical Islam"; the problem isn't Muslims; the problem isn't immigration. We just need to create respect for human rights, to close down a few extremist mosques, deport a few crazy preachers. Most of the "Counterjihad" movement does the same.

None of the people you have mentioned has proposed any solutions that would actually work. Why? Because they're afraid. They have internalised the dogmas of the system and no solutions are possible within those constraints. They content themselves with spreading awareness about the evil nature of Islam, hoping that solutions will somehow magically emerge in future because they're too afraid to think of them or talk about them themselves.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...


If you accept the establishment dogmas of a people's identity being defined by a government status called citizenship, the dogma of Law of the Soil, the dogmas of human rights, all people being equal, all religions being good, that something called racism exists and is some kind of cosmic evil that our entire society should be structured around combating, etc. then you cannot find a way out of the predicament we are in because it is those ideas that have created the problem.

Back in the old east bloc, there were people who opposed the Communist regimes by saying they didn't represent true socialism. They had internalised the ethical standards of the totalitarian regimes they lived under and could only bring themselves to oppose the regimes on their own terms. That's exactly the position most of the Counterjihad movement is in now, still fervently attached to the ideas that caused the problem in the first place.

If your chosen Counterjihad strategy involves trying to play nice with the European elites who are committing genocide against their own peoples, don't come here expecting me to be a part of it just because we both oppose Islam. Your strategy almost certainly isn't going to work, so I'm going to try a different one. If you don't like my approach, don't visit my website. What you shouldn't do is come here and demand that I suppress other people's freedom of speech, because that isn't going to happen.

chimoio said...

what a load of waffle your very good at it aren't you!the old cobblers..ex football hooligan, what about ex muslims? are they irideemable as you seem to be saying,what kind of purity of past life is required in your view?I didn't come onto your precious website demanding anything,I sought to point out that perhaps posting about niggers etc might just alienate people that don't think in terms of exterminating niggers etc,people that might find it dare I say, offensive? you write as if you are the only one capable of independent thought,every one else mere avatars of whatever the "establishment"decrees,you know nothing of my "strategy" I will say this much I do think that it will end in blood and snot on the streets of europe full scale, and people will be glad to have "ex football hooligans" out there when the mierda does properly hit the fan,it's been an education visiting your site,until yesterday I wasn't aware of a poloi and hoi poloi structure in existence amongst anti jihadis and as one of the clearly lower order of beings here, I tug my forlock milord,apologies for not knowing my place.[sarc off]hey i'm even beginning to wonder if you have an "establishment" false flag op running here,as I said you don't do anything any other site isn't doing,except of course disparage other people that don't like islam either,don't like your approach?no,can't say I do

Full Auto said...

The problem is that the "Anti-Jihad" movement is filled with nuts like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP696bmx8WU

And while I don't care for the casual use of the word "nigger", the Leftbots above with their "anti-racism" have greatly assisted in the Islamification of the West with their sickening "tolerance."

chimoio said...

exactly my point full auto!you write that leftbots with their anti racism have greatly assisted in the islamification of the west! so as anti jihadists why give them ammunition that bolsters their lies told about people that see islam for what it is!!the post that got me posting here in the first place wasn't a casual use of the word nigger, what he said was that they should be exterminated and that just because they stand upright it doesn't make them human!that's no different to what jihadists and their ridiculous book says about filthy kuffar,are we no better than to stoop to a similar level of stupidity and pigshit thick ignorance!!? btw aint looked at the vid yet

chimoio said...

@fullauto tried the link you gave no joy,what's the title?

Full Auto said...

Anti-racist nut jobs assist Islam...

Try that link to the video. Every leftist should watch it.

Dinan said...

Racism is a broad label and definitions do vary but given the politically correct reality we face it makes little sense to play into the hands of the opposition who already portray any criticism of Islam as racist bigotry. What hope can we have of reaching a wider audience if we strengthen their hand with blatant examples of bigotry?

Racist insults hardly pass as legitimate free speech when sanctions exist to prevent them in many countries and any intelligent commentator should be able to get their message out without resorting to them. Racist bigots have plenty of forums and their freedom of expression isn’t as limited as mine will be if they pollute sites I visit but will stop visiting if I have to suffer their ignorant comments.

While I admire your efforts and hard work on this site it will make it harder for others to get their voices heard if you condone racist insults You have this site,but most of us struggle to be heard on forums where people oppose the message, and if we confine our efforts to sites like this, how does that help spread the message to a wider audience?

The issues concern beliefs actions and behaviour, not skin colour or place of origin but granted, the debate does include issues of mmigration and multiculturalism but allowing racist insults will undermine attempts to discuss these issues and only benefit those who portray any concerns as racist bigotry.

Being clear about the issues is hardly being brainwashed or politically correct and refraining from racist insults while highlighting concern is hardly repression of free speech.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

There is no such thing as "illegitimate free speech" in a moral sense. Those laws you refer to are the principal cause of the predicament we are in. If there had been no criminalisation of free expression, these issues would have been talked out and solved in the public domain long ago, instead of being confined to the blogosphere.

You say your freedom of expression would be limited if other people get to speak, even though you could still say whatever you want. It's a bizarre definition of freedom of expression that includes the mandatory repression of other people's freedom of expression.

The entire conceptual framework of racism/heresy, the idea of drawing lines of Anathema that exclude some of our own people is what has led to the islamisation of our continent. You need to be encouraged to free your mind from those constraints.

And this is no longer just about Islam for me. My thinking has evolved since I started examining this issue. The fact that the peoples of Europe are being extinguished through demographic conquest would still be one of the great crimes against humanity of all time even if their demographic conquerors weren't Muslims. The fact that they are Muslims just makes it worse.

Unfortunately, there's no way to change the name of the website. Maybe I'll start another with a name that more appropriately reflects the totality of my concerns some time.

I am not willing to delete comments unless they are spam or threaten the continued existence of the site. If you don't like being exposed to other people's free speech then don't read any comments or don't visit the site.


Full Auto said...

Just to expand on your point a bit, a man with a spine, Paul Weston, delivers a potent dose of truth: The Woolwich murder and the state of Britain ...

This is a message for all Western nations. We are running out of time. We must make a significant change in course within the time span of our next generation to avert the demographic winter we are headed toward.

Dinan said...

CZ …….. ‘I am not willing to delete comments unless they are spam or threaten the continued existence of the site’

So you do accept there are limits to free speech for whatever reason and occasions when even you may find it necessary to limit someone’s freedom of expression.

FA mentioned Paul Weston a commentator who freely and forcefully expresses his opinions without resorting to childish insults, and if he were to use them it would obscure and undermine his argument regardless of any legal repercussions.

The fact he refrains from gratuitous insults and frames his views in civilized terms strengthens his argument rather than detracting from it.
Asking people to conduct a civilized debate without gratuitous insults is not limiting their opinions it’s asking them to express themselves in a less offensive way. If they can’t or won’t, then I don’t wish to listen to them. If I want to hear bigoted rants, I can watch a video of Hitler or visit a mosque or two.

I agree the problems we face go further than the issue of Islam including the deliberate undermining of western nation states and their people, and the forced acceptance of massive third world immigration but these issues won’t be addressed if debate is hijacked by inarticulate bigots limited to uttering racial insults

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

First of all, it's not being hijacked. The people using the word nigger - and I don't accept your characterisation of them - are just one voice among the many. You should ask yourself why you and others are so irrationally sensitive to this particular combination of syllables.

Second, the more I think about it, the more it seems to me these various speech inhibitions are, in fact, the principal constraint we face. And if they could suddenly be systematically be violated by everyone, or at least a great many people, at the same time, then the system would come down.

I will make a post about this some time.

You talk about Paul Weston. To be honest, I haven't read much of his stuff for a while so I'm not sure exactly where he is now. But it is clear to me that for a long time he deliberately suppressed or muted his concerns about the extinction of the English people and limited himself to talking about Islam. Why is that? Because of the culture of fear and anathema, based on the kind of speech inhibitions that you are defending.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

"So you do accept there are limits to free speech for whatever reason and occasions when even you may find it necessary to limit someone’s freedom of expression."

Not really. Spam isn't part of a discussion. It's just an irrelevant intrusion. If I have to delete a sincere contribution to the discussion for fear of legal action, I resent having to do it. In a truly free country, I wouldn't have to do it.

chimoio said...

DINAN i suspect that as well as being anti islam cz is of the same ilk as the person posting above that said african niggers should be exterminated because they are clearly sub human. he leaps too vehemently the defence!more than a little dis honest of him to call the website "islam versus europe" because it's clearly "anti" a bit more than that ,and IMHO
part of the problem

chimoio said...

DINAN doesn't accept your characterization of them either....!what does that say?

Search

Loading...

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews