Monday, 27 May 2013

The worst consequence of the colonisation of our countries by third-world peoples is not jihad; it is not crime; it is not the parasitism of our welfare systems and consequent bankruptcy of our public exchequers. It is the abridgement of our freedoms.

Third-worlders come to live within European civilisation in effect as refugees from their own failed countries. The third-world, by definition, has failed. Failed to achieve societies that offer prosperity and freedom to those who live in them. Why this is so, why some countries succeeded and others didn’t, is perhaps the most important question in the secular realm. Marxists tell us the third-world failed because evil whitey came and enslaved it. Europe-hating sophisticates like Jared Diamond tell us it was all a matter of luck. A dice roll. But the simple truth is that the third world failed because it didn’t respect freedom. The freedoms Europeans fought to achieve against the wishes of their rulers gradually led to greater opportunities for talent, the dissemination of knowledge, and the spread of prosperity. The third world became the third world because the people who lived there did not value freedom enough.

And when those same people come to live in our countries they don’t jettison their cultural baggage. They bring no sense of having come from a failed culture into a successful one. Instead, they lap up the Marxist-tinged self-hatred of European elites, blame whitey for their own historic failings and not only maintain their own decrepit cultures but hyper-emphasise them. They continue making the same failed choices that their ancestors made, based on the same failed values, enshrined in the same failed cultures. But this time they’re doing it here. In our countries. Through the ballot box. And this puts a constant pressure on our weak-kneed politicians to conform to their freedom-hating agenda. The tangible result is the continuous restriction of European freedom since third-worlders began to colonise our lands. As well as voter pressure, their own barbaric behaviour serves as the pretext for further restrictions on freedom. The result of the third-world presence is a constant corrosive effect on liberty.

That’s why I won’t be joining in the celebrations about the new initiatives announced by the British government in response to the Woolwich jihad attacks: shutting down websites, spying on communications, etc. These will restrict the freedoms of everyone who lives in Britain, including the soon-to-be minority who actually are British. And the nature of our Equality Cult-driven politics being what it is, we can be sure that these measures, originally introduced to combat jihad, will be later extended to the “far-right”, in other words the people who saw what the effect of large numbers of Muslims living in our countries would be long before the politicians did. This is exactly what happened to the insane Prevent scheme, which was brought in to target Islamic radicals and ended up subsidising them while targeting “Islamophobes” instead. Equating the jihad and the Counterjihad – those who carry out murderous attacks and those who merely chronicle their barbarity and warn about its future consequences – has long been one of the favourite rhetorical gambits of the western multicult. See Nick Cohen’s piece in the Observer for a despicable recent example of it in response to the Woolwich attack.

For the first time since 9/11, the similarities between violent movements in the west are more important than their differences. They replicate and feed off each other. So entwined have the English Defence League and radical Islam become, they might as well be married.

…The attacks by radical Islamists in the west today are not very different from the attacks on mosques that followed the murder of Drummer Rigby or the bombings organised by the "dissident" IRA: small scale, mean in every sense of the word and pointless.
The similarities do not stop there. The founders of the English Defence League were inspired by Islamists who disparaged British troops. The EDL has in turn produced the Muslim Defence League. David Anderson, Britain's independent reviewer of terrorist legislation, is so concerned by the reciprocal relationship between certain religious groups and the white far right, he is thinking of investigating whether the police are treating both partners in this ugly waltz equally.
Source: The Observer

Cohen says the EDL and the jihadists need each other. What a laughable claim. As if anyone in the EDL, or the Counterjihad movement more broadly, wants to do this with their lives. Who in their right mind would want to expose themselves to physical threat, arrest, social ostracism, the risk of being deprived of their livelihood, and all the other life-crushing sanctions that the multicult totalitarians have brought into play to defend their corrupt system? We are doing this in response to problems that a government immigration policy has created. We didn’t need these problems in our lives. We didn’t need these problems in our country. Defence is not the moral equivalent of attack. Drawing attention to the threat posed by murderous barbarians is not the same thing as being a murderous barbarian.

The token gestures proposed by the government do nothing to address the underlying problem. The single most important metric describing the magnitude of the jihad threat Britain faces is, very simply, the number of Muslims who live here. An immigration policy that is allowing the Muslims to double their number every decade makes any tinkering with security policy largely irrelevant to containment of that threat.

The correct policy response to the jihad threat is not to restrict the freedoms of all UK citizens. So what is it? First, a distinction should be made between those with historical roots in the country and more recent arrivals. For a hundred years after their arrival in the country, immigrants and their descendants should be subject to a positive duty of integration. Those who fail to meet this duty should be removed from the country. This duty should be applied retrospectively to everyone who had an immigrant ancestor within the last hundred years. These probationary citizens will have a special status in law that could render them subject to specially intrusive measures, such as surveillance. This legal distinction would allow governments to tackle the jihad threat without abridging the freedoms of genuinely British people.

Second, all Muslims should be required to register as such with the government. Being an unregistered Muslim should be a criminal offence. This will allow the government to take such special security measures as it deems necessary to contain the threat of jihad, against the specific group that poses that threat, without abridging the freedoms of others. If jihad militants are intent on carrying out an attack, it is, of course, unlikely that they would register as Muslims with the government. That in itself, however, is a useful warning sign that could flag up a future threat. If someone participating in Islamic activities is found to be an unregistered Muslim, the intelligence services should thereafter pay special attention to them. In addition, the offence of being an unregistered Muslim will offer an easy conviction, establish a criminal record and allow the opportunity to deport if the offender is an immigrant.

Third, Participation in Jihad should be made a capital offence and participation should be defined very broadly to include even expressing support for the idea of jihad. The Woolwich attackers flaunted their own support for jihad for years before carrying out their attacks. All such people, such as Anjem Choudhary and his mob, all of those who promote jihad ideas or march under jihad flags, should be charged with Participation in Jihad and put to death. If there are 1000 jihadists in Britain, execute 1000 people. If there are 10,000, execute 10,000. If there are 100,000, execute 100,000. Kill them all. There is no advantage to Britain or the world in keeping these people alive.

22 comments:

Anonymous said...

Exellent points, all of them. I believe the only thing that has allowed these people to survive in the continent thus far is hate crime laws. They need.repealed the sooner the better. I beleive a mega tsunami of public (British and other non-muslim) hatred would drive these people out as swiftly as their behavior is constantly abhorant.

Anonymous said...

The following post about the terrorist attack in Woolwich got me "banned" from Muslimbook (Facebook) yesterday for 30 days:

"What's most troubling about the Islamic Jihadist attack and murder of the British soldier in London is the behavior of the crimi-grants from the "Dark" continent in the background. Those "people" as some here have called them are not "human", they're uncivilized Muslim savages, followers of the pig raping pedophile Mohammed. Didn't anyone other than intelligent Americans & Brits notice the "Sister of Obama" pushing the stroller past the meat-cleaver & butcher knife wielding, blood soaked, murdering MuSLIME or the other "African-types" in the background? Those feral followers of Mohammed the pig raper had no fear of the killers because they belong to the same beastial brown-skinned "community" of savages. The idiots milling about probably celebrated the death of the soldier once the cameras were gone. Winston Churchill, a fan of the Queen's Artillery and frequent visitor to the Woolwich barracks and Margaret Thatcher are turning in their graves watching as their once great empire is destroyed systematically by Liberals "multiculturalists" and their murderous Muslime pets."

What is happening to "Western" nations is a crime, our civilized society is being systematically destroyed by multi-culturalists, diversity advocates, and Liberals politicians. We MUST stand fast, fight back, and win our survival depends on it.

Anonymous said...

Soon enough these fuckers will reap what they sow. Every single time one of these things happens the civilized world inches closer to responding in kind. Every time these pigs riot, rape or kill an innocent, another peace loving westerner becomes fed up. They're pushing and pushing and eventually they will push us to eradicate them all. With every Molotov cocktail, with every soldier killed, with every working stiff robbed, they inch closer to their demise. I am aware and I am fed up and waiting...

Anonymous said...

If there are 10,000, execute 10,000. If there are 100,000, execute 100,000. Kill them all.

Don't agree at all. If we do this what is difference between us and Islam or other totalitarian ideologies. Besides such an act will so taint our civilisation that its stain will affect us for centuries.

DP111

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

The differences would be all the same ones that would exist if we didn't do it. We would be targeting not system dissidents only, but only one specific kind: jihadists. This would be a recognition of the fact that jihad is a unique evil in history.

As I said in the article, defence is not the moral equivalent of attack. Over the centuries, we've killed millions of aliens in various wars, most of them now largely forgotten, most of them fought over trivial issues that did not fundamentally threaten the well-being of Britain. Does having done that stain us for centuries? No. So why would eliminating mortal enemies in our midst?

It is our rarefied sense of ethics that is killing our civilisation. Unless we can get past it, and learn to act ruthlessly in our own defence, we're not going to survive.

Anonymous said...

CZ wrote: The differences would be all the same ones that would exist if we didn't do it. We would be targeting not system dissidents only, but only one specific kind: jihadists. This would be a recognition of the fact that jihad is a unique evil in history.

How is one to target such individuals - before or after they have committed Jihadi acts. If after, then they would be subject to the normal processes of war or the law. If before, how is one to determine that a thought crime will definitely lead to a physical act of terror.

I know that Jihadi acts like the Woolwich slaughter, Fort Hood and Daniel Peasl's beheading, gives rise to great anger. But a one has to come up with a policy that actually helps instead increasing the rate of an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth cycle.

DP111

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

You don't need to definitively establish that it will lead to an act of terror. Just target anyone who expresses support for the idea of Jihad and its related conceptual framework. Choudhary's mob, for example, march under Jihad flags. That should be enough. Convict them and execute them. What is the advantage in keeping these people alive?

Fear is a powerful motivator. Ruthlessly executing jihad-minded Muslims will intimidate those other Muslims who might be tempted to join them.

Anonymous said...

CZ wrote: Just target anyone who expresses support for the idea of Jihad and its related conceptual framework. Choudhary's mob, for example, march under Jihad flags. That should be enough.

I don't think it is enough CZ when you are going to apply capital punishment. For instance, contemplating murder or even mass murder (heaven forbid), is not the same thing as actually carrying it out.

One may punish these individuals for "hate thought crime", but it will be well short, and has to be, of capital punishment.

Fear is a powerful motivator, but for it to be successful it has to be implemented forever. And what is to prevent a state that has successfully implemented such a policy to Jihadis, to stop it from extending the principle to others who oppose it. Once such a line has been crossed, we are all guilty. The Orwellian police state of thought crime, will have been established.

DP111

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

The action would not be based on the assumption that they would one day carry out murder. The Jihad mentality is threatening to us in all kinds of ways, not just through murderous attacks, which, statistically at least, actually pose an insignificant threat.

It needn't be implemented forever. It could be regarded as an interim expedient prior to the expulsion of the entire Muslim population. Even if the Muslims are allowed to remain, exterminating the jihadis consistently would eventually produce a change in the main body of Muslims and in the culture of Islam itself.

Any human characteristic varies in a large population, usually with a bell curve distribution. And these characteristics are largely passed on genetically from one generation to the next. If countries facing a jihadi threat, including Middle-Eastern countries, not just western ones, made it their policy to exterminate, say, the 1% or 2% most jihadi-inclined Muslims in every generation, their genes would be taken out of the human gene pool. After a century or two, this would produce a significant change in the make-up of the population. The hotheads would no longer be as much of a problem, because their genes would be gone. Without their disruptive presence, a less threatening version of Islam would evolve.

Anonymous said...

You ask me the religion needs to be eradicated globally. I've seen enough to know that this is a vile disease of humanity. Religion itself is fundamentally a disease of humanity. It has done nothing but cause death, destruction and impede our species from advancing mentally and scientifically, but no religion is on the level of Islam when it comes to death, destruction and impeding progress. At least I can say that every other religion on the planet has evolved to be tolerant of others. The only Theocracies left in the world are Islamic. The Islamic scriptures are written in such a way that violence is default, subjugation of women is default, sharia law will never mix with a free society and sharia law is every Muslims' guiding compass. By eradicating this religion, the world will be a much better place. By eradicate, I fully endorse destroying every page of Islamic scripture, every mosque, every symbol of islam and even the documented history of it. I fully endorse executing or imprisoning every last adult male muslim and give the opportunity for the women and children to denounce the religion and learn what it's like to live without fear of rape and pedophilia happening to them in the name of Allah. Without fear of being executed for being raped or having a different belief. Fuck Islam and its barbaric cult ways.

logdon said...

Executing them is not the way and given the political and cultural climate in Britain, a complete no hoper.

What you are proposing is akin to Minority Report whereby a propensity to commit a crime is sufficient.

Although I agree absolutely with your analysis up to that point, suddenly you lurch into the foothills of Nazi ideology whereby simply being part of a group is sufficient for a death sentence.

I feel that the answer is deportation even if second or third generation.

The poetic justice of being ejected from civilisation and forcibly having to live under a system which creates the impoverishment they escaped in the first place is spot on.

They want shariah? Let them have it but not here.

And dna record or whatever is necessary to prevent any return. Once gone, that's it.

They blew it and that's the way it stays.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

It wouldn't be based on group membership but individual action in participating in jihad. Clearly some groups, however, are dedicated to the jihad.

The current political and cultural climate is irrelevant. By explaining how things can be done differently, we can change it. The Muslims certainly will change it just by acting like Muslims.

Anonymous said...

The Muslims certainly will change it just by acting like Muslims.

That....and the understanding that islam contains no ethics, no golden rule.
They gots to go!

Zaba said...

Oops, didn't want to be anonymous

The Muslims certainly will change it just by acting like Muslims.

That....and the understanding that islam contains no ethics, no golden rule.
They gots to go!

LX™ said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

White pig,wake up! London died and Londonistan born.
all human must unite to resist this cancer and must cure it completly.Chinese Japanese Koreans Hidus and Isreal and America and Austrilias must united to cure it completly

Anonymous said...

My sister just came from Europe all sad and upset. She couldn't go anywhere without Muslim men harassing them and grabbing her daughter's behind and running away. They were wearing jeans and long t-shirts and still they would not leave them alone.It wasn't like they were showing themselves. It was awful. The police did nothing and just told them to file reports. It is so sad to see so many European men do nothing to protect their women. They talked to so many who do not dare to go out alone any more. And that was in Spain where the men are still manly enough to come to the defense of a woman!! A few kicked them out and made them go away but in some places there are so many of those immigrants that it seems like the European governments are literally unable to control it. There are beautiful neighborhoods that now look like the ones in the movie "Taken 2." All dirty and crowded with like 3 families living in a single home and throwing their bathroom refuse right on the street. if you want to visit Europe, go right now because in less than 15 years Notre Dame will probably be a mosque and muslims would certainly destroy the beautiful work of art they Europeans have accumulated for centuries. Go now as it getting too late for some areas in Europa.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

Where did this happen?

Anonymous said...

In Spain and then In Paris, France. There were groups of men who hung around the touristic areas watching the women pass by. My relatives were harassed first in Madrid, then in the train going to Barcelona, next in Paris near the Eiffel tower while in the line waiting to go up, again around some small Museum in downtown Paris. Later again in a street in Paris right in the middle of a crowd by the Champ Elysees. The French men just looked at them while the Muslim kids grabbed my niece by the hair and stuck their hands between her legs and some French men even laughed at the incident. It was so disgusting. Two Muslim men also followed them from their Hotel to a local restaurant and tried to steal their camera. When they couldn't because it was attached to my niece's belt, one of them tried to slap her but she moved away quickly and they let go. The man then threw his body against her pinning my niece against a wall and groped her all over before taking off running after my sister and my niece began to scream. Those gangs are everywhere like the plague. The French police came and just made stupid apologies and nothing happened. A kind French lady told them not to go to Belgium where is even worse. By the time the vacation was over, they were so glad they were back here in America. The attacks were in public and crowded places, in daylight, at lunch time, and touristic areas full of people. Nobody would do anything. The French men just looked away or pretended to be busy and only the women yelled at the men to stop. I guess their lives must be a daily nightmare so they were the few who showed some concern. Most of those groups are young guys with some looking like they are not older than fifteen, they go in groups of four or more and coward any French guy who tries to help. They gang on them. Only one guy was brave enough to use his phone to call police. Most of the French were rather passive after witnessing those gangs of Mulslims guys assaulting the tourist women and some their women too. Other female tourists in the group also got assaulted. The Muslim guys would come straight at them pretending to be passing by in the opposite direction, but then the group of six or more guys would crash into the group of women grope anyone and then run away with some of them also stealing purses or whatever they can get their hands on. The tourist guide kept telling us to stay with the group to avoid more assaults but those groups of Muslim guys just surround the groups constantly. There was no escape. Some of the guys in the tourist group stayed in the outside to protect the women but as I said, there were just too many of those groups of young Muslim men everywhere. The French police just simply would not chase them or do anything. They wrote something in papers and in two of those occasions stayed for a while with them but eventually left and the groups came back to continue groping the women. It was so appalling also to see the French people's complete lack of concern about the incidents. I think they are already getting so used to the constant abuse that they do not care anymore. It must be common to them now.

Anonymous said...

Oops! I forgot the most important part! Many of those men verbally insulted my relatives also by telling them that they were touching them because they were "non-muslim Pu..n" and therefore not worth of respect. That term, "Put..." is a harsh term to call a woman in France and Spain.

Cheradenine Zakalwe said...

I'm posting this as a main article here.

Anonymous said...

I 100% believe in and support stopping any muslim immigration to Greece and with cancelling all plans of building any mosque in Greece.
To the whole world, please leave Greece in peace, they are one of few remaining countries that do believe in Christianity principles and laws.

Regards,
Ghadeer

Search

Loading...

Blog Archive

Powered by Blogger.

Blog Archive

Total Pageviews