Friday, 27 August 2010
Some people believe that the mere passage of time will help solve the Muslim problem; Muslims and non-Muslims will grow more used to one another, they argue, and then they will all live happily ever after. But this picture is frighteningly false.

Studies of Muslim opinion in Britain show that Muslim attitudes are not converging towards British norms but are, in fact, moving further and further away from the British norm. In many ways this is the most frightening lesson to be learned from Britain's experience of Muslim immigration. The third generation Muslims now growing up in Britain are more extreme in their attitudes than the first generation Muslims were. Indeed, in many respects, they are more extreme in their attitudes than the Muslims living in Muslim-majority countries in the Middle East. This is a truly extraordinary and almost incredible phenomenon. No assimilation is taking place. Instead, a process of disassimilation is underway.

There is some unique incompatibility between European culture and Islamic culture. When exposed to a European host, Muslim culture retreats into its most retrograde characteristics, becoming almost a caricature of itself. Bangladeshis from Bangladesh come to Britain and are shocked by how backwards and primitive the Bangladeshis here are. Turks from Turkey are similarly shocked by the lifestyles of Turks living in Germany.

Another factor is the behavioural pattern observed across history and across the world in the present day: the more Muslims there are concentrated in a specific area, the more aggressively they behave.

In parts of the world where there are very few Muslims, for example Scotland where Muslims are less than 1% of the population, people tend to wonder what all the fuss is about. "These Muslims seem alright," they say. "It must just be evil racists or fascists kicking up all this fuss elsewhere." Or they delude themselves into think that their unique virtue inspires reciprocal virtue in the Muslims; or that, somehow, they got the "good Muslims". But this is a delusion. Up until they are about 1-2% of the population, Muslims often act in a perfectly normal way. From that point on, there is an ever upwards trajectory of violence and confrontation until the Muslims have extirpated everyone else.

Dr. Peter Hammond, in his book Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: the Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat, analysed this Muslim behavioural pattern:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens.

This is the case in:
United States—Muslim 0..6%
Australia—Muslim 1.5%
Italy—Muslim 1.5%
China—Muslim 1.8%
Norway—Muslim 1.8%
Canada—Muslim 1.9%

At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs.

This is happening in:
Denmark—Muslim 2%
United Kingdom—Muslim 2.7%
Germany—Muslim 3.7%
Spain—Muslim 4%
Thailand—Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on, they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves—along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:
Switzerland—Muslim 4.3%
Philippines—5%
Sweden—Muslim 5%
The Netherlands—Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago—Muslim 5.8
France—Muslim 8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam , with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam. Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in:

Guyana—Muslim 10%
Kenya—Muslim 10%
India—Muslim 13.4%
Russia—Muslim 15%
Israel—Muslim 16%

After reaching 20%, nations can expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings, and the burnings of Christian churches and Jewish synagogues, such as in:
Ethiopia—Muslim 32.8%

At 40%, nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare, such as in:
Bosnia—Muslim 40%
Chad—Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon—Muslim 59.7%

From 60%, nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon, and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels, such as in:
Malaysia—Muslim 60.4%
Albania—Muslim 70%
Sudan—Muslim 70%
Qatar—Muslim 77.5%

After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in:
Bangladesh—Muslim 83%
Indonesia—Muslim 86.1%
Syria—Muslim 90%
Tajikistan—Muslim 90%
Egypt—Muslim 90%
Jordan—Muslim 92%
United Arab Emirates—Muslim 96%
Pakistan—Muslim 97%
Iraq—Muslim 97%
Iran—Muslim 98%
Gaza—Muslim 98.7%
Morocco—Muslim 98.7%
Palestine—Muslim 99%
Turkey—Muslim 99.8%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’—the Islamic House of Peace. Here there’s supposed to be peace, because everybody is a Muslim, the Madrassas are the only schools, and the Koran is the only word, such as in:
Afghanistan—Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia—Muslim 100%
Somalia—Muslim 100%
Yemen—Muslim 100%

Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states the most radical Muslims intimidate and spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims, for a variety of reasons.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

What a great article , and they know that democracy gives them carte blanche to do as they please , its been imposed on us by our Lilly liveried leaders it is too late to stop it we are sleep walking over a cliff.

HalfElf said...

The safeguards of civilization are abused by the infiltrating barbarians, and twisted to benefit a minority beyond their legitimate sphere of influence. I personally do not care if there is a halal grocery section because the local population supports it, I am opposed to mandated commerce by fiat. All I ask is that when I comply with the concept of freedom of religion, and do not meddle in Jewish, Buddistic, Catholic,Muslim, Athiest, or any other religions internal workings, they reciprocate and do not require me to obey their teachings.
If all of the major religions were to obey their scriptures the world could be a better place, but human nature leads to one upmanship and competition between sects means no peace even for those who know peace. To qoute Reginald Denny "Cant we all just get along?".
If the Quaran didnt forbid a Muslim from contradicting another Muslim to an unbeliver we might hear from the mythical legendary moderate non violent Muslims who benefit from the same society that they are allowing their immams to tear down from within.

Anonymous said...

Here is the answer - for the US anyway -

http://pedestrianinfidel.blogspot.com/2007/02/proposed-constitutional-amendment.html

read the whole thing but here is the money quote -

"Immediately upon passage of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made."

Not that we'll ever get the stones to pass this kind of amendment. The sheeple don't even understand the problem.

Kizone Kaprow said...

HATERS HATE BEING CALLED HATERS.
https://plus.google.com/+KizoneKaprow/posts/9s8MGWWP89z

john prime said...

I have been saying the same thing. The mosques should be turned into Gomes for injured war vets who were injured defending us from these Muslim islamic satanic savages.

RAVI CHANDRAN said...

Hi British,
You will see a bloodthirsty violence soon as you had welcomed this Muslim vipers.It definitely bite you.

RAVI CHANDRAN said...

Hi British,
You will see a bloodthirsty violence soon as you had welcomed this Muslim vipers.It definitely bite you.

Joe Pilsworth said...

Your in need of a good education Abdul...if you look at the person's name who posted the article she certainly dies not have a British name...like mine anyway.

Joe Pilsworth said...

Your in need of a good education Abdul...if you look at the person's name who posted the article she certainly dies not have a British name...like mine anyway.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to see this updated to 2016

Powered by Blogger.

Total Pageviews